Was that before or after you "architected" for Opus Dei, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the American Bible Society?
Your tortured misuse of that term is a really bad look. It's bad enough how our profession hides behind its alienating linguistic register to put a spell on the lay audience & seduce our initiates to believe erroneously that we might actually know something beyond bureaucratic functionality and our cult of bad taste. But then to abuse the language like this - with a legally binding term that the unregistered can't claim, no less - to serve your smug pride is uber-childish.
Did you also "realize" your "concepts" in those buildings?
Did you learn to push for purely ceremonial, entirely impotent whistleblowing in those halls, too?
Why do you insist that politically practical leaking should not be , widely projected and should have no effect in the active logos & public consciousness? Don't you realize that a library unused is no library at all?
Do you really think Trump's supporters would have felt the need to go to such great (absurd) lengths to support him & elect an orange-headed reality TV clown/monster, if the public responses to Snowden's & Assange's exposures had been appropriate, proportional, robust reforms in enforcement of the Constitution?
Are you too blinded by your Trump Derangement Syndrome to realize that your own defamation of that heroic whistleblower & that profoundly powerful journalist - implying that they were controlled opposition psyops, or at least useful idiots that can be ignored and neglected - actually may have led (in some small part) to the necessity felt by many to elect one of either Trump or Bernie in the first place?
Had the disaffected alt-public chosen to rally behind WL & Snowden rather than neglect them perhaps the total for-profit surveillance panopticon we now live under might have been shackled with something of a digital Bill of Rights & its tyrannical figureheads appropriately punished. Instead you coerced most of Corbett's audience to deny them and you did it with the rhetorical grace of Dick Cheney and the confident resolution of Judas. Good work. Well done, dude. Very cyberpunk of you.
Maybe try "architecting" those "precedents" and "diagrams" into your binary mental "paradigm," and you might just might transcend your profound mirror-blindness & Trump induced psychosis. Though, I'm sorry to predict that there's no hope for your bad taste & poor judgement in client. That's irredeemably here to stay.
Was that before or after you "architected" for Opus Dei, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the American Bible Society?
Your tortured misuse of that term is a really bad look. It's bad enough how our profession hides behind its alienating linguistic register to put a spell on the lay audience & seduce our initiates to believe erroneously that we might actually know something beyond bureaucratic functionality and our cult of bad taste. But then to abuse the language like this - with a legally binding term that the unregistered can't claim, no less - to serve your smug pride is uber-childish.
Did you also "realize" your "concepts" in those buildings?
Did you learn to push for purely ceremonial, entirely impotent whistleblowing in those halls, too?
Why do you insist that politically practical leaking should not be , widely projected and should have no effect in the active logos & public consciousness? Don't you realize that a library unused is no library at all?
Do you really think Trump's supporters would have felt the need to go to such great (absurd) lengths to support him & elect an orange-headed reality TV clown/monster, if the public responses to Snowden's & Assange's exposures had been appropriate, proportional, robust reforms in enforcement of the Constitution?
Are you too blinded by your Trump Derangement Syndrome to realize that your own defamation of that heroic whistleblower & that profoundly powerful journalist - implying that they were controlled opposition psyops, or at least useful idiots that can be ignored and neglected - actually may have led (in some small part) to the necessity felt by many to elect one of either Trump or Bernie in the first place?
Had the disaffected alt-public chosen to rally behind WL & Snowden rather than neglect them perhaps the total for-profit surveillance panopticon we now live under might have been shackled with something of a digital Bill of Rights & its tyrannical figureheads appropriately punished. Instead you coerced most of Corbett's audience to deny them and you did it with the rhetorical grace of Dick Cheney and the confident resolution of Judas. Good work. Well done, dude. Very cyberpunk of you.
Maybe try "architecting" those "precedents" and "diagrams" into your binary mental "paradigm," and you might just might transcend your profound mirror-blindness & Trump induced psychosis. Though, I'm sorry to predict that there's no hope for your bad taste & poor judgement in client. That's irredeemably here to stay.
Oy